Solutions / Integrations
Bring AML screening into the systems your teams already use
Trigger checks from onboarding, payment, customer, and operations systems, import customer populations when a file workflow is the right fit, and send decisions back through cases, evidence, and webhook events.
Integration paths
Start simple, then automate the flows that matter
Compliance integration should not require a platform migration. Connect the first operational handoff, prove the control, and move higher-volume workflows into API and webhook automation when the process is ready.
Call screening from onboarding, payment, customer update, or monitoring workflows so checks happen at the point of risk.
Use file and cohort workflows for customer bases, remediation projects, periodic reviews, or teams that are not ready for a full API rollout.
Route potential matches into cases, preserve evidence, and notify downstream systems when review outcomes are ready.
Integration model
From business event to compliance outcome
Checklynx sits between the systems that generate risk signals and the teams that own compliance judgment. Each integration path keeps the trigger, screening response, decision, and evidence traceable.
| Stage | Enterprise context | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Business event | Onboarding, customer update, payment, monitoring cycle | Screening request or import job |
| Ingestion path | API request, CSV import, cohort import, portal run | Controlled entry point |
| Screening and routing | Screening profile, policy, case creation, reviewer queue | Structured compliance response |
| Decision handoff | Case outcome, false positive, escalation, resolution note | Owned review result |
| System update | Webhook event and report record | Downstream systems aligned |
Why teams choose it
Practical integration without losing compliance control
The commercial value is not just connectivity. It is a controlled handoff where business systems can move quickly while compliance keeps ownership of policy, review, and evidence.
Begin with CSV, cohort, or portal workflows and move repeatable, high-volume paths into API automation over time.
Use webhook events so downstream systems can react without polling for every change.
Product systems trigger the check, Checklynx screens and routes it, and compliance teams decide the outcome.
Keep requests, results, case decisions, reviewer rationale, and delivery context connected for audit and governance.
| Trigger | Handoff | Business outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Onboarding or customer update | API-triggered screening | Risk checked before the business process moves forward |
| Back-book or remediation batch | CSV or cohort import | Large customer groups screened without manual copy-paste work |
| Potential match found | Case creation and reviewer assignment | Compliance owns the decision and rationale |
| Decision completed | Webhook handoff | Business systems receive the outcome they need to continue |
How should teams phase an AML integration?
Most teams should not start by integrating every workflow. A practical rollout begins with the highest-risk or highest-volume handoff, proves the control, and then expands. CSV, cohort, and portal workflows can cover early operations while APIs and webhooks automate the paths that are stable enough to connect.
What is the commercial value beyond connectivity?
The value is a clean boundary between fast business systems and controlled compliance work. Product, payment, or onboarding systems can trigger checks and receive outcome events, while Checklynx keeps the screening evidence, review rationale, case history, and audit trail under compliance control.
Can downstream systems act on compliance outcomes?
Yes, when your operating model allows it. A downstream system can continue onboarding, hold a payment, request more information, or update a customer status based on a controlled outcome. The compliance decision itself remains traceable in Checklynx, with the evidence and reviewer context attached.