Solutions / AML Compliance
Checklynx AML screening software helps compliance teams screen customers and counterparties against sanctions, PEP and wanted-list sources, with adverse media available as an additional check. Review potential matches in structured profiles and keep decisions connected to ongoing monitoring and case history.
Source records, identifiers, earlier decisions, and monitoring context stay attached for human review.
Connected AML operations
Checklynx connects the screening access method, enabled risk sources, customer or counterparty record, human review, monitoring policy, and retained evidence. Each specialist control keeps its own purpose while the decision history stays connected.
Keep sanctions, PEP, wanted-list, adverse-media, customer-risk, and case processes distinct while connecting their relevant outcomes to the same customer record.
Checklynx groups likely related source records into profiles and uses available names, aliases, identifiers and other identity attributes to compare the screened party with each candidate. Corroborating details support the comparison; conflicting attributes reduce confidence. This can reduce false positives when distinguishing information is available and helps analysts review related evidence together.
Preserve what was screened, which policy applied, who reviewed the result, what they decided, and which later change caused another review.
AML compliance operating model
Start with an onboarding, customer, counterparty, payment-party, or periodic-review event. Run the appropriate screening check, route potential matches to accountable people, retain the outcome, and return relevant changes for later review.
Checklynx AML screening software helps compliance teams screen customers and counterparties against sanctions, PEP and wanted-list sources, with adverse media available as an additional check. Review potential matches in structured profiles and keep decisions connected to ongoing monitoring and case history.
| Stage | Enterprise context | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Identify the subject and event | Customer, company, UBO, related party, counterparty, or supplied payment party | The screening scope is explicit. |
| Run the appropriate check | Portal, API, CSV, or monitoring against enabled risk sources | Results remain connected to the business event. |
| Review potential matches | Candidate profile, source context, identifiers, notes, and escalation | An accountable person records the outcome. |
| Retain and revisit | Policy, request, response, decision, timestamps, and case history | Relevant changes can return with the earlier context attached. |
Control ownership
Checklynx can organise source-backed results, retain previous outcomes, and route changed risk signals. The customer defines the screening policy, decides which parties and events are in scope, and remains responsible for consequential compliance decisions.
Apply approved source coverage, matching settings, review routing, and monitoring cadence through the access method suited to each workflow.
Potential matches, higher-risk records, and relevant changes move to authorised analysts with the source and decision context attached.
| Trigger | Handoff | Business outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Screening configuration | Customer policy and enabled sources | The organisation controls scope and thresholds. |
| Potential match | Grouped result and source evidence | An authorised person reviews the candidate. |
| Recorded outcome | Decision, justification, case history, and timestamps | The control can be tested and explained later. |
Use the practical guides to define your screening process, or compare vendors before choosing the software that will support it.
Choose the access method that fits the business event while keeping screening results, reviewer outcomes, and evidence connected.
Run direct customer, counterparty, and investigation checks in the browser.
Explore 02Real-time screening APIEmbed checks into onboarding, payments, and other operational events.
Explore 03CSV batch screeningReview migrations, remediation files, and defined customer or supplier populations.
Explore 04Ongoing monitoringReturn relevant source or customer-data changes for controlled review.
ExploreConnect the customer, company, UBO, related party, or counterparty in scope.
Run the appropriate checks and keep the source-backed result attached.
Assign potential matches and retain the authorised reviewer outcome.
04Monitoring and evidenceReturn relevant changes and preserve the control history for later review.
30–40%CashDirector reports that clustered profiles and fewer false positives help its compliance officers review cases faster.
20%Shopware connects retained false-positive decisions, customer screening and ongoing monitoring.
AML screening software compares customer and counterparty identity information with selected sanctions, PEP and other risk sources to identify potential matches for review. Checklynx connects those results to case management, ongoing monitoring and retained evidence. A potential match requires assessment under your organisation’s policies; it is not an automatic compliance decision.
No. Screening checks the identity of a customer, counterparty or payment party against selected risk sources. Behavioural transaction monitoring examines activity patterns and transactions for suspicious behaviour. Screening payment parties and re-screening customers after source changes serve different purposes from behavioural transaction monitoring.
Checklynx connects sanctions, PEP and RCA, wanted-list, watchlist, and adverse-media screening with customer-risk assessment, case management, ongoing monitoring, and retained audit evidence. Each control remains distinct while relevant results stay connected to the customer or business event.
Yes. Teams can begin with browser-based portal checks or CSV population screening and connect event-driven checks through an API. Webhooks, cases, monitoring, and evidence can then support the downstream systems and review processes already in use.
No. Checklynx prepares screening results, source context, review history, and workflow signals. Authorised people apply the organisation’s policy and remain responsible for decisions such as approval, escalation, enhanced due diligence, rejection, or reporting.
A reviewed false-positive outcome can remain linked to the customer and candidate match. If the relevant data has not changed, the previous decision can reduce repeated work; new or changed information can return to the review process with the earlier context attached.
The record can include the subject and event, selected policy and sources, request and response, candidate source context, reviewer, notes, justification, outcome, timestamps, and case history. The exact retention and access rules remain under the customer’s governance.
No. This page explains how Checklynx supports an AML operating model as software. The practical AML compliance guide covers the broader programme responsibilities, legal perimeter, risk assessment, due diligence, escalation, governance, and testing.
